Compare

Credible vs. TextQL

TextQL is an AI analyst that reaches across warehouses, BI tools and SaaS systems, with an ontology in your own repository and a warehouse it runs inside your environment. Credible starts from an open modeling language and serves governed context to whatever agent you already use.

How TextQL describes itself

What TextQL is

TextQL is an enterprise AI data analyst. Ana writes SQL, runs Python, searches the web and produces charts, reports and files, working from an ontology — metric definitions, entity relationships, joins and access rules authored as .tql files in a git-backed repository — across more than 50 connected sources. Roughly half of its production workloads run on-premises or in customer VPCs, alongside a purpose-built warehouse that runs in the same place.

Credible and TextQL compared across 12 dimensions.

Category
Credible
AI-native analytics engine with an integrated data stack
TextQL
AI data analyst over the whole stack, with an ontology layer and a warehouse of its own
Who it is built for
Credible
AI product and analytics teams, plus anyone who works with data — spreadsheet users through ML engineers
TextQL
Enterprise data teams, and the business users whose questions queue behind them
Primary interface
Credible
The agent you already use, over MCP — plus Workspaces, notebooks, reports and data apps for the people who want a UI. All of them consume the same model rather than being the place it lives
TextQL
Chat — threads with Ana in the TextQL app, in Slack, and from any MCP client
Modeling language
Credible
Malloy — a modeling and query language with imports, inheritance, and public and private members
TextQL
.tql — a SQL-native semantic layer format, kept as reviewable files in a git-backed ontology repository
What is open
Credible
Open core. Malloy is open source, and we build and maintain Malloy Publisher, the open-source server for Malloy models. Your model is code in your repository, and Credible is in the Apache Ossie ecosystem for semantic interchange
TextQL
Vendor-owned format, with the ontology itself kept as files in a repository you control
How the model gets built
Credible
A coding agent with open-source MCP tools and agent skills, capturing context from where it already lives
TextQL
Ana maps relationships across the connected sources, and .tql files are authored and reviewed on top
Governance
Credible
Governance as code. Access rules are annotations in the model itself — versioned, reviewed and composable like any other code
TextQL
Role-based access control with SSO and SCIM, and role and tenant rules declared in the ontology
Materialization and caching
Credible
One annotation on the source, in the same file as the logic it materializes — no derived-table block, no rollup definitions, no refresh triggers, no orchestration run to schedule. Optional per source: query your own warehouse directly, or hold a source hot in Credible’s in-memory serving layer, which is how a team on Postgres gets fast serving without buying a warehouse to get it
TextQL
A purpose-built warehouse running inside your environment, so exploratory work over raw data does not wait on modeling
How an agent finds the right data
Credible
Search. Typed targets — source, dimension, measure, view, even a dimensional value — are matched against an index of the model and come back ranked, so an agent asks for what it needs instead of picking a model and touring it
TextQL
Ana works from the ontology and its connectors, and picks its own tools per question rather than walking a fixed sequence
Where the model can be used
Credible
One model served to every surface — agents over MCP, plus APIs, an SDK, embedded dashboards, notebooks and HTML data apps. Results carry an interactive UI resource (MCP Apps, the official extension), so a client that supports it renders a real chart or table instead of the model re-narrating rows
TextQL
Threads in the app, Slack, playbooks scheduled to email, embeds, a v2 REST API, and Ana itself as an MCP server
Scale and portability
Credible
Built for globally distributed, high-availability workloads. Warehouse-agnostic on open-source Malloy — BigQuery, Snowflake, Postgres, MySQL, Trino, Presto and DuckDB, which also reads Parquet straight out of object storage including Azure Data Lake — so the model travels
TextQL
Over 50 connectors — warehouses, BI tools and SaaS APIs — deployed as SaaS, in your VPC, or on-premises by Helm chart
What you pay for
Credible
Usage, not seats — unlimited users on every plan, so adding people never changes the bill. Metered per organization on tokens, bytes processed, bytes served and hot storage, starting free. Your own agent’s tokens are never billed, and a query that runs on your own warehouse is not metered for the scan — only for the result it hands back
TextQL
A tiered subscription carrying a monthly allowance of Agent Compute Units, with overage beyond it and no per-seat charge

A different premise

Where Credible takes a different approach

These are differences in what each product set out to be, not faults in TextQL. Credible was built the other way around from a BI tool: capture what your data means, enrich it into a governed model in open-source Malloy, and serve that meaning over MCP to the agent you already use — with a UI of our own available, but never assumed.

What the extra compute is for

Both of us bring compute beyond the model. TextQL runs a purpose-built warehouse inside your environment, and that is what lets Ana work over raw, unprepared data instead of waiting on the months of modeling that usually come first — a direct answer to a real problem. Credible’s serving layer is pointed at a different job: it materializes modeled sources, indexes them and holds them hot in memory, so retrieval and queries come back in milliseconds rather than warehouse-scan minutes. It is also optional, and decided per source: anything you would rather leave where it is gets queried there instead, across BigQuery, Snowflake, Postgres, MySQL, Trino, Presto and DuckDB. That matters most to a team running analytics on Postgres who wants a few views served fast without buying a warehouse to get it.

SQL fragments, and a modeling language

.tql is deliberately legible: authored SQL templates with sanitized interpolation and typed parameters, kept as files rather than compiled behind a planner, so a reviewer — or a model — can read exactly what will run. Malloy takes the other route and gets composition for it: imports, inheritance, and public and private members, so a definition is written once and reused, and the compiler emits SQL for seven dialects. Both end up as code in a repository. The difference shows up as a model grows: a .tql file states each surface explicitly, where Malloy lets one definition stand behind many, which is what keeps a large model something a person can still hold in their head and an agent can extend without breaking.

Open files, and an open language

Keeping the ontology as files in a repository you control is a good decision, and not every vendor in this category makes it. Credible carries the same idea one step further out: Malloy is an open-source language, Malloy Publisher is the open-source server we build and maintain for it, and Credible is in the Apache Ossie ecosystem — so the model is readable and runnable by tools that are not ours.

An analyst you call, and context your agent reads

Ana is the analyst. It plans the work, writes the SQL, runs the Python and hands back the result, and it is reachable from Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients as well as from TextQL and Slack. Credible serves the model rather than an agent: sources, dimensions, measures, the rules attached to them and the engine underneath, over MCP — so the reasoning happens inside the agent your team already runs, with results carrying an interactive UI resource so a chart renders in that client. Both put an answer in front of someone; they differ on whose agent does the thinking.

Other comparisons

Compare Credible with the rest

Capability claims about TextQL were checked against public sources in August 2026. Products in this category change quickly — confirm anything decision-critical with the vendor. Sources: Ana, the ontology and the .tql format — TextQL documentation; Connectors, deployment types, RBAC and Ana as an MCP server — TextQL documentation; $17M round anchored by Blackstone Innovations Investments — TextQL, 2026.

Ready when you are

Bring your own data and judge for yourself

See what a governed model looks like when agents, not dashboards, are the primary consumer.